Angelica's profileAsia Century Institute BlogNetwork Tools Help

Blog


    September 22

    Globalisation the difference between risk and uncertainity

     
     
    The difference between risk and uncertainity is that risk is the variability in a state of nature and uncertainity is the probability of shifts between multiple states of nature.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Speech by Governor Liikanen: "Globalization: Declining Risks but Increasing Uncertainty?", Buenos Aires

    Governor Erkki Liikanen Buenos Aires, 4 June 2007


    Bank of Finland

    2007 Money and Banking Conference hosted by the Central Bank of Argentina

    "Monetary Policy Under Uncertainty"

    Session on Underlying Forces in the Global Economy

    Speech by Governor Liikanen: "Globalization: Declining Risks but Increasing Uncertainty?"

    http://www.bof.fi/en/suomen_pankki/ajankohtaista/puheet/2007/el_puhe04062007.htm


    Introduction

    Globalization is the big story of our times. Forces of globalization change the domestic inflation process and the way in which monetary policy measures are transmitted in the domestic economy.

    The uncertain nature and magnitude of these changes makes the job of the central bankers more demanding. But at the same time, globalization has helped central bankers by exerting some dampening effect on prices.

    On balance, the low and stable inflation we have witnessed in recent years gives confidence that central bankers can cope with this uncertain and changing operating environment as long as the process of globalization remains orderly. Therefore, I will not today talk much about how globalization is changing the domestic inflation process and the transmission mechanism of monetary policy.

    Instead, in my remarks today, I will mainly talk about how globalization is changing the landscape of risks and what this implies for central banks and other policymakers. In particular, I will discuss the somewhat paradoxical phenomenon of a broad-based decline in risk premia at the time when uncertainty, i.e., those risks that cannot be readily quantified, may in fact be increasing.

    Globalization: the big picture

    It is often claimed that there is nothing new about globalization. While this may be true in some sense, it seems to me that the current phase of globalization differs markedly from the previous ones in its extent, speed, intensity and impact.

    It is not possible to pinpoint the exact start of the current phase of globalization. But still, we can say that the demise of centrally-planned economies – most notably the internal transformation of China and the dissolution of the Soviet Union – unleashed the forces of globalization which had been building up during the 1980's.

    The obvious result of this was that the former communist block countries opened up and became integrated into the world economy. The failure of the centrally-planned economic models profoundly changed the political landscape in already democratic countries. Specifically, it enabled and prompted them to adopt increasingly market-oriented policies conducive to competition and improvements in productivity.

    The point which I want to stress here is that, although globalization is nowadays often seen as an inevitable and irreversible "force of nature", its present phase was triggered by political events and needs some global institutions and international political support to be sustained.

    If the collapse of central planning was the main trigger, then rapid advances in technology have been the main driving force behind globalization. In particular, the explosive development of information and communication technologies has played a central role. By reducing dramatically the cost of transporting and sharing information and services, it has made the world more interconnected and interdependent than any reasonable observer could have thought possible just 20 years ago.

    September 13

    Urbanisation, secularism and respect for diversity in South East Asia

    The link between poverty reduction and income distribution and an increase in secularism is tenuous, if not almost ridiculous if considered in isolation. There are a number of cultural and political factors that influence the organisation of societies in developing an understanding of diversity.

    ‘Diversity: the art of thinking independently together.
    Malcolm Forbes

     

    South East Asia has experienced rapid social, political and economic change in the past two decades. It is home to the largest population of Muslims outside of middle east, with substantial proportion of the population of South East Asia also  practicing Taoism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, and Christianity, as well as, combinations of religious teachings. Economic growth in South East Asia has not been hindered by the diversity of religion but enhanced by the acceptance of diversity.

    In this way, the continent of disparate communities, nations and states that existed at different times in history has already had a profound influence on the world.

    This process extended over several thousand years, and the religions of Asia in past millennia are still the great religions of Asia today; even if somewhat transformed.

    The term 'Asian century' is used in the name of the Institute to capture the essence of widespread debate about shifting foundations of international order under the very powerful influence of events in Asia. It recalls the debates over 'Asian values' and it is certainly relevant to the manner in which the governments of Asia frame their policies.

    Of course it is possible to see the idea of 'Asia' as an 'orientalism', an artificial, value-laden definition for a geographic space defined by somewhat arbitrary boundaries in a manner long since lost to history. The term is rightly criticised for concealing great diversity and lack of regional cohesion. But as noted above, 'Asia' is an idea that has survived and which retains considerable political relevance.


    The concept of human safety is evolving and is being discussed as an alternative to the traditional security paradigm. This has occurred as new threats to global security and well being of people are challenged by new unforeseen events.

    2008 marks the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: 1948-2008. In 2004, the UN high-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change set out a bold, new vision of collective security for the 21st century.

    ‘We live in a world of new and evolving threats, threats that could not have been anticipated when the UN was founded in 1945 – threats like nuclear terrorism, and State collapse from the witch’s brew of poverty, disease and civil war.’